Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01450
Original file (PD2012 01450.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW


NAME:    CASE: PD1201450
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130423
SEPARATION DATE: 20050408


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve SGT/E-5 (91W20/Medic) medically separated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). He was evacuated from Iraq in 2004 for what presented as a potential cardiac issue. Upon further evaluation at home station, he was diagnosed with sleep apnea and started on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), he was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The OSA condition, characterized as “severe” by the MEB was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded four other conditions (contact dermatitis with lower extremity edema, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and anxiety disorder), judged to meet retention standards. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the OSA requiring CPAP condition as unfitting, rated 0%. The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting and therefore not ratable. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting OSA condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050323
 VA - (5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Obstructive Sleep Apnea 6847 0% Obstructive Sleep Apnea 6847 50% 20050906
Contact Dermatitis..LE Edema Not Unfitting Dermatitis 7899-7806 0% 20050906
Hypertension Not Unfitting Hypertension 7101 NSC 20050906
Hyperlipidemia Not Unfitting No VA Entry
Axis I: Anxiety Disorder Not Unfitting PTSD w/ Dysthymic Features 9411 10%* 20050901
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 1 20050906
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 60%




ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation nor for conditions determined to be service-connected by the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. However, the DVA, operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the Veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on severity at the time of separation.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Condition. The CI was a 46 year old Army Reserve member who was re-deployed home by medevac from Iraq, in 2004, for lower extremity edema and shortness of breath. He had received one prior sleep study, in 2002, which at that time, had ruled out OSA. The diagnosis of severe sleep apnea was made after a sleep study and pulmonology consultation, in Dec 2004, noted severe hypoxia and extensive oxygen desaturation during sleep. Pulmonary consultation noted heavy snoring, daytime somnolence, sleepiness while driving, choking respiration, and altered sleep architecture. The room air blood gas noted hypoxia, with a resting pO2 at 66mmHg (very low), but a normal pCO2 at 39 mmHg, with no evidence of carbon dioxide retention which would suggest respiratory failure. The narrative summary (NARSUM), 15 months prior to separation, noted the diagnosis of OSA and that the CI failed to meet retention criteria IAW AR 40-501 paragraph 3-41c. The PEB found him unfit for continued service, noting that although this condition existed prior to mobilization, he was compensable because of the 8-year rule.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed, 5 months after separation, the CI claimed that his illness began in Iraq and was associated with a 40 pound weight loss. The VA examiner noted that the CI’s medical record noted a long history of loud snoring, reported by his wife. The VA noted that his polysomnogram noted positional sleep-disordered breathing with a “good response to CPAP.” The CI noted that there was no adverse side effect to his CPAP treatment and that his course was improved.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The diagnosis of OSA, dependent upon CPAP, is well established from the CI’s pulmonary consultation of December, 2004. Favorable response to CPAP is well documented. The PEB’s DA Form 199 assigned a 0% rating, and based the fitness adjudication solely on field impediments to the use of CPAP. Contemporary PEBs across all of the Services no longer consider OSA to be unfitting solely on that basis; but, this Board, by legal opinion and firm precedent, does not make contrary recommendations to a PEB determination that a condition was unfitting. The VA rated this condition at 50% due to the requirement for constant use of a CPAP device. Although the PEB’s rating adjudication had been acceptable by DoDI 1332.39 standards, the Board is obligated to a rating recommendation compliant with concurrent VASRD standards. VASRD mandates a minimum rating of 50% under 6847 for OSA requiring a breathing assistance device. In consideration of the evidence, and IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must recommend a disability rating of 50% for the OSA condition. This case does not meet the criteria for 100% because, at no time, was there evidence of chronic respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor pulmonale.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 50% for the OSA condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the OSA condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 50%, coded 6847 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Obstructive Sleep Apnea 6847 50%
COMBINED
 50%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120908, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





        
         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130009083 (PD201201450)


1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 50% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 50% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 

                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02822

    Original file (PD-2013-02822.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (42A20/Human Resources Sergeant) medically separated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with nocturnal hypoxia, treated with bi-level positive airway pressure (BIPAP). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01483

    Original file (PD-2013-01483.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION : The CI simply stated “Sleep Apnea.” A 50% disability rating is warranted when the disability requires the use of a breathing assistance device such as a CPAP machine. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00671

    Original file (PD2011-00671.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that the CI was not using CPAP at the time of the separation. After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The diagnosis in his finding of unfitness for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, VASRD code...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02123

    Original file (PD-2013-02123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “Obstructive Sleep Apnea with CPAP, mild impairment” as unfitting, rated 0%. Therefore, IAW VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD)§4.97 (schedule of ratings,respiratory system)and 6847 rating criteria, the disability due to the OSA condition meets the 50% rating specified as “requires use of breathing assistance device such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine, but does not meet the next higher...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00787

    Original file (PD 2012 00787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Moderate To Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Requiring Nightly Use of CPAP Condition. In consideration of this evidence, and IAW DODI 6040.44, the Board must recommend a separation rating of 50% for the OSA condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00625

    Original file (PD2011-00625.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty member, SSG/E-5 (3P051/Security Forces Journeyman), medically separated from the Air Force after 10 years of service. VA treatment notes through 2008 show the CI continued to use his CPAP machine. Other PEB Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02268

    Original file (PD-2014-02268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB rated the condition at 0% whereas the VA rated it at 50%. The use of CPAP supports the 50% rating assigned by the VA. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00192

    Original file (PD2013 00192.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The back and sleep apnea conditions, characterized as “lumbar spine, DDD w/chronic low back pain” and “obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), requiring CPAP” [continuous positive airway pressure], were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded 10 other conditions for PEB adjudication. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with military service, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00768

    Original file (PD2011-00768.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army CASE NUMBER: PD1100768 SEPARATION DATE: 20041010 BOARD DATE: 20120209 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (92G, Food Service Specialist), medically separated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In the matter of the obsutructive sleep apnea condition, the Board unanimously recommend a permanent service...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00557

    Original file (PD2011-00557.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the cervical spine and OSA conditions as unfitting; assigning a disability rating of 10% to the cervical condition citing criteria of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); and, 0% to the OSA condition referencing Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. Other PEB Conditions . The other conditions forwarded by the MEB and adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB were lumbar spondylosis (pain dating to same fall as for the cervical...